our new museum

The Mary Rose – Racing Yacht?

Those of you with long memories may remember a postcard we used to sell in the museum shop depicting the Mary Rose, the Great Harry and two other, unnamed vessels, with Portsmouth’s Round Tower in the background, with a caption that read “Cowes Week 1545”. While this was obviously a joke (Cowes Week only began in 1826), there is some truth in depicting the Mary Rose in a maritime race…


21st March, 1513. Admiral Sir Edward Howard has recently claimed the Mary Rose as his flagship, and he and his fleet are just off the north-east coast of Kent. He sends out an unusual command, the ships were to head east, then make a sharp turn beyond north Foreland, then head south, on the western side of the Goodwin sands. For the first time in English naval history, the Admiral had ordered a race.


The route the race took around the south-east coast of England

The route the race took around the south-east coast of England

It wasn’t that fair a race, all things being told. They didn’t line up at the start, indeed some ships were as much as four miles ahead of the Mary Rose when the race began. This advantage does not appear to have been helpful, as the Mary Rose managed to finish ahead of all the others, the Sovereign, one of Henry VII’s old warships finishing second with the Nicholas coming third. There’s no mention of the Mary Rose’s sister ship, the Peter Pomegranate, which may have been assigned to a different fleet. The last across the line was the Maria de Loretta, which, along with the Christ and the Katherine, received very poor reviews from Admiral Howard, who wrote to Henry VIII himself, saying that “I trust we may remedy her well enough that she shall follow with the best.” Interestingly, the Christ is claimed to be overladen with ordnance, a claim often attributed to the Mary Rose when she sank. That the Christ managed not to sink during a difficult manoeuvre in open waters suggests this may not have been the only reason for her loss.


Howard, in the same letter (partially reproduced here), has nothing but praise for the Mary Rose, referring to her as ”the noblest ship of sail” and “The flower […] of all ships that ever sailed”. His constant praise for the Mary Rose may be due to his pride in his new command, but is more likely due to Henry’s influence on the building of the ship. While all the other vessels in the fleet were the king’s ships, the Mary Rose was purpose built for the king, who may have had a hand in her design. (Again, this is something often blamed for the sinking of the Mary Rose, often by people who think she sank on her maiden voyage, although Henry assisted in the design of other ships that managed to remain afloat.) Having recently been given the title of Lord Admiral by the king, perhaps Howard wanted to show his gratitude by complimenting the king’s ship-building abilities.


The Mary Rose

Sadly, once you start thinking that way, you have to wonder if the race was entirely fair. This was the first time an English military fleet had performed such an action, so it’s possible that the other captains, not wishing to offend their new commander, let him win.


Then again, the Mary Rose was a new ship, pride of the fleet, and so may have had an exceptionally well trained crew, capable of handling the vessel in such a way that she was able to outmanoeuvre the rest of the fleet. Howard even refers to the techniques the crew used during the race in his letter raising and lowering bonnets and adjusting the sails to catch side winds, and they appear to have been sufficient to allow the Mary Rose to perform well. If the rest of the fleet let the Mary Rose win, they didn’t make it easy.

Letter from Sir Edward Howard to Henry VIII, 22 March, 1513.


 “Your good ship, the flower, I trow, of all ships that ever sailed, reckoning … every ship, and came within three spear length of the Kateryn, and spake to John Flem[ming and to] Peter Seman, and to Freman, master, to bear record that the Mary Rose did fetch her at the tay[l on her] best way and the Mary’s worst way; and so, Sir, within a mile sailing left her an fly … at the sterne; and she al the other, savyng a v. or syx smal shipps which cut o[ver the] Forland the next wey. And, Sir, then our curs chanched, and went hard uppon a bowlyn … the Forland, wher the Mary Rose, your noble shyp, fet the Mary George, the Katerryn Prove, a bark … Lord Ferys hyryd, the Leonard off Deartmowth; and som of them weer iiij. long myle afor m[e] or ever I cam to the Forland. The next shipp that was to me, but the Sovereyn, was iij. myl behynd … but theSovereyn past not half a myle behynd me. Sir, sche is the noblest shipp of sayle [of any] gret ship, at this howr, that I trow be in Cristendom.


“The first after the Mary Rose was theSo[vereyn], [then the] Nycholas, then the Leonard of Dertmouth, the Mary George, the Herry of Hampton, the Anne [of Greenwich], the Nycholas Montrygo called the Sancheo de Garra, the Kateryn, the Mary [Fortune].


“Sir, one after another, there was a fowle tayle betwen the Mary Roose and the aftermest [which] was the Marya de Loretta. And the Crist was one of the wurst this day. She may beer [no more] sayl, no mor may the Katerryn.”


From http://www.british-history.ac.uk/letters-papers-hen8/vol1/pp771-790

  • Share on Tumblr